Mobile park, refusal of landlord to trim tree for satellite reception? - tenant right of first refusal
Tenant canceled cable service for misconduct or a service. On the basis of satellite services, the service was good, until he appeared in the leaves of the trees. "He asked the owner of the mobile home park on trees to get reception. Categorical rejection.
Satellite dish company has several adjustments in vain
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Tenant Right Of First Refusal Mobile Park, Refusal Of Landlord To Trim Tree For Satellite Reception?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
I would not destroy my tree either. The people dealing with this all the time, neighbors had trees everywhere.
Move the plate or get a service where you can face the satellite. This is not the problem, owners, and certainly should not deface the landscape because of it.
You really have no legal recourse here.
If the tree is in the house he rented, so I think we cut. If it is not to cause permanent damage to the tree (ie, death or after cutting should be below) well.
If the tree on the grounds of the owner in life, you are not legally allowed to touch the tree. When you cut yourself, you can sue for property damage.
are not bound to a tree, for any reason, unless there is a risk cut.
Cable Sabbath is not a necessary service - no need to do something to the service available.
The only option is to reduce permission to the tree at his expense, and have every right to refuse to ask.
I do not see how your landlord is obliged to cut a tree for your convenience. It looks like a security problem. Why not compromise? To ask permission to hire a fire service at their expense.
I do not see how your landlord is obliged to cut a tree for your convenience. It looks like a security problem. Why not compromise? To ask permission to hire a fire service at their expense.
He is not obliged to change their trees. Treat yourself to pay for it?
He is not obliged to change their trees. Treat yourself to pay for it?
Post a Comment